<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Printable Vouchers &#8211; Twitter Baby! @vouchers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.existem.com/printable-vouchers-twitter-baby-vouchers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.existem.com/printable-vouchers-twitter-baby-vouchers/</link>
	<description>Existem - Experts in Affiliate Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:40:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.existem.com/printable-vouchers-twitter-baby-vouchers/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 09:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.existem.com/?p=194#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,

Totally agree with the automated twitter searcher, we trialled it out for a few hours and were amazed how many people we found.  I still think its a viable option but you need to manually validate each find and ensure it&#039;s relevant.  We did find some people who were genuinely thankful however also some who did not like its spammy nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi&nbsp;Tom,</p>
<p>Totally agree with the automated twitter searcher, we trialled it out for a few hours and were amazed how many people we found.  I still think its a viable option but you need to manually validate each find and ensure it&#8217;s relevant.  We did find some people who were genuinely thankful however also some who did not like its spammy&nbsp;nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Rowlands</title>
		<link>http://www.existem.com/printable-vouchers-twitter-baby-vouchers/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Rowlands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.existem.com/?p=194#comment-399</guid>
		<description>First of all, well done for getting the &#039;vouchers&#039; Twitter URL. As for the &#039;is it ethical&#039; debate: I personally think it&#039;s fine, as long as you make it clear that it&#039;s a purely commercial channel and not a personal one (as you have done). I&#039;ve got to say, however, that I don&#039;t like your constant &quot;Hey, you can find the latest Strada Restaurant Printable Vouchers @vouchers, hope its useful! :-)&quot; tweets at people; that kind of thing certainly is against the Twitter ethos in my opinion. Think you should read Kieron&#039;s recent post on making it a bit more personal. Picture of the Queen is highly disturbing, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, well done for getting the &#8216;vouchers&#8217; Twitter <span class="caps">URL</span>. As for the &#8216;is it ethical&#8217; debate: I personally think it&#8217;s fine, as long as you make it clear that it&#8217;s a purely commercial channel and not a personal one (as you have done). I&#8217;ve got to say, however, that I don&#8217;t like your constant &#8220;Hey, you can find the latest Strada Restaurant Printable Vouchers @vouchers, hope its useful! :-)&#8221; tweets at people; that kind of thing certainly is against the Twitter ethos in my opinion. Think you should read Kieron&#8217;s recent post on making it a bit more personal. Picture of the Queen is highly disturbing,&nbsp;too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.existem.com/printable-vouchers-twitter-baby-vouchers/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.existem.com/?p=194#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Hi Frostie,

It&#039;s just an experiment to see if twitter can be used in this way.  If its a success then maybe we&#039;ll expand the concept.

We&#039;ve chosen printable vouchers as it reduces the noise around the tweets, it&#039;s also less competitive.

I was not aware of your twitter account on the subject but it appears to be highlighting everything from free delivery to discount codes, this is something very different.

&quot;are you after 500 members joining up, or 500 other voucher code sites joining up to ensure they never miss a deal?&quot;

This may well be the case but we cant stop that from happening!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi&nbsp;Frostie,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just an experiment to see if twitter can be used in this way.  If its a success then maybe we&#8217;ll expand the&nbsp;concept.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve chosen printable vouchers as it reduces the noise around the tweets, it&#8217;s also less&nbsp;competitive.</p>
<p>I was not aware of your twitter account on the subject but it appears to be highlighting everything from free delivery to discount codes, this is something very&nbsp;different.</p>
<p><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span>are you after 500 members joining up, or 500 other voucher code sites joining up to ensure they never miss a&nbsp;deal?&#8221;</p>
<p>This may well be the case but we cant stop that from&nbsp;happening!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.existem.com/printable-vouchers-twitter-baby-vouchers/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.existem.com/?p=194#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Personally I dont think its against the ethics, and thats why I created a Twitter channel only 10 days ago for my voucher site - http://twitter.com/discounts4u

Are you after 500 members joining up, or 500 other voucher code sites joining up to ensure they never miss a deal? Also what was the idea of only pushing printable vouchers via twitter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I dont think its against the ethics, and thats why I created a Twitter channel only 10 days ago for my voucher site -&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/discounts4u" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/discounts4u</a></p>
<p>Are you after 500 members joining up, or 500 other voucher code sites joining up to ensure they never miss a deal? Also what was the idea of only pushing printable vouchers via&nbsp;twitter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.existem.com/printable-vouchers-twitter-baby-vouchers/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.existem.com/?p=194#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Good points Pete - After an initial tweet burst I&#039;d imagine we&#039;d reach saturation and then add just a couple of vouchers each day.

Hopefully that&#039;s not too excessive for our followers - good point on the hashtags - will start adding these to the tweets.

p.s where&#039;s the background ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Pete - After an initial tweet burst I&#8217;d imagine we&#8217;d reach saturation and then add just a couple of vouchers each&nbsp;day.</p>
<p>Hopefully that&#8217;s not too excessive for our followers - good point on the hashtags - will start adding these to the&nbsp;tweets.</p>
<p>p.s where&#8217;s the background&nbsp;;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.existem.com/printable-vouchers-twitter-baby-vouchers/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.existem.com/?p=194#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Guess I&#039;ll start the ball rolling Matt.

I think it will work if we keep the &#039;signal to noise&#039; ratio fairly high &amp; aren&#039;t firing out blocks of tweets in quick succession. It&#039;s certainly a  transparent approach and, as always, it&#039;s opt in/opt-out.

Might be a good idea to #hashtag everything so it&#039;s findable, I think that approach has been fairly well adopted now. 

I can see potential for some nice mash-ups too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess I&#8217;ll start the ball rolling&nbsp;Matt.</p>
<p>I think it will work if we keep the &#8216;signal to noise&#8217; ratio fairly high <span class="amp">&amp;</span> aren&#8217;t firing out blocks of tweets in quick succession. It&#8217;s certainly a  transparent approach and, as always, it&#8217;s opt&nbsp;in/opt-out.</p>
<p>Might be a good idea to #hashtag everything so it&#8217;s findable, I think that approach has been fairly well adopted&nbsp;now. </p>
<p>I can see potential for some nice mash-ups&nbsp;too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
